SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
Tarun Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Nitish Banka, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Nakul Mohta, Advocate with Mr. Devaish Srivastava, Advocate for OP-1, Mr. R. Manasa Gayathri, Advocate for OP-2

ORDER

Dr. Inder Jit Singh, Presiding Member—The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainants against the opposite parties as detailed above, inter alia praying for:—

(i) Refund of the entire amount paid by the complainant to the opposite parties towards consideration of the flat booked by them in the project of Opposite Parties known as “RISE”, situated in RP City, Sector 37-D, Gurgaon, Haryana, alongwith interest @18%.

(ii) Rs 5,00,000/- as compensation on account of mental agony, harassment and towards cost of proceedings etc.

2. Notice was issued to the opposite party on 08/01/2019 giving them 30 days time to file their written statement.

3. It is averred/stated in the complaint that:—

(i) That the complainants booked a flat on 27.04.2012 in the residential Project launched by the Opposite Parties in the name of “RISE”, situated in RP City, Sector 37-D, Gurgaon, Haryana and was allotted flat No. 2203, on the 22nd Floor, tower A with a Super Area 1765 sq.ft. A provisional allotment letter da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top