S. M. KANTIKAR, BINOY KUMAR
Manik Chandra Khan – Appellant
Versus
Amit Saha – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member “Every death in an institutionalized environment of a hospital does not necessarily amount to medical negligence on a hypothetical assumption of lack of due medical care.”[ IV (2022) CPJ 7 (SC)]
The Present Complaint has been filed under Section 21 (Read with Section 24-A) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) by Dr. Manik Chandra Khan & Gouranga Maji (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Complainants’) against M/s. Extent Medical and Surgical Centre & its 5 Doctors (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘Opposite Parties’) for alleged medical negligence causing death of daughter of the Complainant No.1.
The Complaint:
2. Ms. Sanchita Khan (since deceased herein referred to as a “Patient”) was suffering from fever and on 26.10.2015 her father took her to Dr. Amit Saha (OP-1) at Extent Medical & Surgical Centre (OP-6) at Chandannagar. The OP-1 prescribed medicines and few lab investigations. The next day (27.10.2015), at 11 am, the patient’s fever spiked to 1050 F and it decreased around 2 pm. She had loose motion also which, stated by OP-1, was due to side effect of Moxclav (Amoxicillin). He admitted her in OP-6 hospital on 28.1
Chanda Rani Akhouri vs. M.S. Methusethupathi Mithupathi (2021) 10 SCC 291.(Para 24)
Malay Kumar Ganguly vs. Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee and Ors.
Arun Kumar Manglik vs. Chirayu Health and Medicare Private Limited and Anr.
C.P. Sreekumar (Dr.), MS (Ortho) vs. S. Ramanujam
Kusum Sharma and Ors. vs. Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.