INDER JIT SINGH
Director, General State Transport Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Prajapat – Respondent
ORDER
The present Revision Petitions (RPs) have been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, against the common order dated 16.09.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeals FA/31/2020, FA/30/2020, FA/56/2020, FA/57/2020, FA/75/2020, FA/76/2020, FA/77/2020 in which order dated 09.12.2019 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UT, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as District Commission) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no. CC/1086/2019, CC/1087/2019, CC/1128/2019, CC/1129/2019, CC/554/2019, CC/41/2019, CC/42/2019 was challenged, inter alia praying to set aside the State Commission’s order.
2. As the above stated 7 RPs have been filed against the similar orders of the State Commission, parties involved are the same, and issues for consideration/determination are related, these are being taken up together under this order. However, for the sake of convenience, RP 567 of 2022 is treated as the lead case and facts enumerated herein under are taken from RP 567 of 2022.
3. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as OP) was Respondent-1 and th
Wg. Cdr. Arifur Rahman Khan and Aleya Sultana and Ors. vs. DLF Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
(1) Deficiency in service - Section 39(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019/Section 14(1) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. empowers the Consumer Commissions to remove the deficiency in service if....
A complaint's status under consumer protection laws remains intact despite the complainant's engagement in commercial activities, requiring a thorough examination of relevant evidence.
Right to an appellate remedy becomes vested when the lis is initiated. The remedy which was available prior to the amendment would continue to be available despite the amendment. Therefore, it is for....
The Consumer Protection Act applies to insurance claims for employee medical reimbursements under comprehensive policies, viewing the employer as a consumer.
(1) Once a judicial forum comes to conclusion that it lacks jurisdiction in the matter, it must refrain from making any observations on merits of case.(2) Electricity – Being a customer/consumer with....
The purchase of a vehicle by a company for its managing director's personal use does not constitute a commercial purpose, allowing for consumer protection remedies.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.