SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
Agarwal & Company – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate

ORDER

This first appeal has been filed under section 19 of the Act, 1986 in challenge to the Order dated 28.02.2019 of the State Commission in appeal no.39 of 2015 of the State Commission Rajasthan.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

Perused the record including inter alia the impugned Order dated 28.02.2019 and the memorandum of appeal.

3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:—

Complainant, which is jeweller, obtained a Jewellers Block Policy from the opposite party insurance company which was valid for the relevant period from 22.07.2010 to 21.07.2011. During the currency of the policy, however, in the intervening night of 28-29.01.2011, during the transit, the said gold bar was stolen. Appellant came to know about the theft on 29.01.2011 and it immediately intimated the insurance company about the theft of the gold bar telephonically. Subsequently, on 31.01.2011 the appellant had also submitted a written intimation to the insurance company about the theft of gold bar. An FIR No. 15 dated 03.02.2011 also seems to have been registered at P.S. Tilak Marg, New Delhi under Section 379 IPC. A number of surveyors were appointed. Eventually, on 19.09.2012 the insuranc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top