SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AVM J. RAJENDRA
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
C. D. Sanjay – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ankur Goel, Advocate
For the Respondent: NEMO (Ex-parte Vide Order Dt. 19.02.2024)

ORDER

This Revision Petition has been filed under Section 58(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (the “Act”) against impugned order dated 08.07.2021, passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore (‘State Commission’) in FA No.378 of 2021 wherein the State Commission dismissed the Appeal and affirmed the order dated 26.02.2021, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hassan (“District Forum”) in CC No.193 of 2019, wherein the Complaint was allowed in part.

2. As per report of the Registry, there is 2 days’ delay in filing the Revision Petition. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the delay is condoned.

3. For convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint before the District Forum.

4. Brief facts, as per the Complainants, are that the deceased, BS Soumya, took out a Jeevan Saral Policy for Rs. 1,00,000/- with an accidental death benefit of Rs. 1,00,000/- upon the persuasion of the OPs to aid their business. She diligently paid the premiums due from 23.12.2011 onwards. However, due to heavy rain and floods in June 2018, she couldn’t pay the premium for that month. Tragically, while en

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top