SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A. P. SAHI, BHARATKUMAR PANDYA
Assistant Director (R. P. L. I. ) – Appellant
Versus
Vithal Kisan Khamkar – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Roshan Lal Goed and Ms. Anju Gupta, Advocates
For the Respondent: Nemo

ORDER

The Postal Department through the Assistant Director (RPLI), the Office of the Post Master, Pune Division, has come up in this Revision Petition assailing the order of the State Commission dated 1.4.2016, SCDRC, Mumbaiat Aurangabad whereby the order of the DCDRC Ahmednagar dated 19.3.2015 has been affirmed. CC/349/2013 had been filed by the Respondent/Complainant that was allowed by the District Commission and the appeal filed by the Petitioners being FA/370/2015 was dismissed as a result whereof the petitioners are aggrieved by the aforesaid decisions.

2. Vide order dated 2.12.2016, an interim protection was given to the Petitioners provided the entire awarded amount was deposited with the District Forum. Notices were issued to the Respondent who sént a letter that was recorded in the order dated 13.4.2017. A reply was also filed in this Revision Petition. No lawyer had appeared on behalf of the Respondent and the case was adjourned from time to time for hearing during the Pandemic. The matter stood adjourned, where after information was sent to the Respondent but none appeared. Accordingly, the matter was finally heard on 14.1.2025 in the personal absence the Respondent tak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top