SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Satya Dulal Das Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Amitava Banerjee – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Debojyoti Bhattacharya, Advocate
For the Respondent: NEMO

ORDER

Sudip Ahluwalia, Presiding Member—This Revision Petition has been filed against the impugned Order dated 13.07.2017 passed by the Ld. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal in Appeal No. 696/2015, vide which the Appeal filed by the Petitioner was dismissed, and the Order of the Ld. District Forum was affirmed.

2. The factual background in brief, is that the Petitioner is the owner of a plot of land with an old two-storied building situated at Premises No. 23, Harey Krishna Sett Lane in North 24 Parganas, measuring about 2 Cottahs 15 Chittack 11 Sq. Ft. The Complainant had been a tenant of the entire ground floor of the building for a long time and regularly paid rent. On 15.04.2010, the Petitioner entered into a Development Agreement with Opposite Party Nos. 2, 3, and 4 for the development of the property after demolishing the old building. Additionally, the Petitioner executed a registered General Power of Attorney on 16.04.2010 in favor of the Developers. As part of the agreement, the Complainant was required to vacate the rented premises for demolition and construction purposes, and to issue a ‘No Objection Certificate’ as necessary. In exchange for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top