SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, PINKI
In the Matter of State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Amar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pinki, Member (Judicial)—The present appeal has been filed on 07.03.2024 challenging the impugned order dated 21.08.2023 passed in Complaint Case No.224/2019 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission- IX (East District), Convenient Shopping Centre, Saini Enclave, Delhi wherein the complaint was allowed.
2. This order will dispose off an application bearing IA No.747/2024 seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal, filed along with the appeal. Affidavit of Mr. R.K. Sinha, counsel of the appellant has been filed along with this application.
3. Record has been carefully and thoroughly perused.
4. The application has been moved under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019. However, it is being considered under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as it is arising out of Complaint Case No.224/2019.
5. The bare perusal of the application reflects that it has been preferred under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 41 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019. However, the entire proceedings of the present case took place according to the Old Act. Hence, before delving into the merits of the pre
CIT vs. Vatika Township (P) Ltd.
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur vs. State of Maharashtra
Basawaraj and Ors. vs. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer
Office of the Chief Post Master General and Ors. vs. Living Media India Ltd. and Ors.
(1) Condonation of Delay – According to State Commission, the appellant has miserably failed to give any acceptable and cogent sufficient reasons to condone such delay.(2) Prescribed period – The app....
(1) Repeal of law – The repeal of a law shall not affect the previous operation of any enactment i.e. the proceedings under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 shall continue for cases which had been filed....
Sufficient Cause – ‘Sufficient cause’ means that the party should not have acted in a negligent manner or there was a want of bona fide on its part and the applicant must satisfy the Court that he wa....
Sufficient Cause – Sufficient cause’ means that the party should not have acted in a negligent manner or there was a want of bona fide on its part and the applicant must satisfy the Court that he was....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.