SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AJEYA MATILAL, SOMA BHATTACHARJEE
Ritu Singh – Appellant
Versus
Green Tech IT City Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Ms. Amrita Jaiswal, Advocate

ORDER

Hon’ble Shri Ajeya Matilal, Presiding Member Learned Advocate for the complainant is present.

2. None is present for the other side.

3. Today is fixed for final hearing.

4. Learned Advocate for the complainant files BNA.

5. Heard the Learned Advocate for the complainant.

6. This is a case under section 17 of the C.P.A., 1986 valued at Rs.44,88,943/-

7. The fact of the case is in short like that;

8. The complainant booked a flat in a project called ‘Terrace Heights’. Situated in the Greentech City at Mouza Bajetaraf, P.S. Rajarhat, Kolkata on 30.01.2014 by paying an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- vide Cheque No. 068152 dated 31.01.2014 drawn on S.B.I., Salt Lake Branch, Electronics Complex, Kolkata. On the same day the complainant gave another cheque of Rs.1,57,725/- by Cheque No. 068153 dated 31.01.2014. Subsequently, the complainant handed over a cheque of Rs. 4,15,000/- by Cheque No. 812821 dated 11.03.2014 drawn on ICICI Bank, Patna Branch. Subsequently, on 29.04.2014 the complainant paid an amount of Rs. 6,45,000/- by Cheque No. 812822 dated 29.04.2014 drawn on ICICI Bank, Patna Branch.

9. The complainant further paid an amount of Rs. 61,854/- by Cheque No. 68154 dated 12.03.201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top