Arun Kumar Roy VS Sibnath Dutta

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

MANOJIT MANDAL
Arun Kumar Roy – Appellant
Versus
Sibnath Dutta – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant Nos.1 to 7:Mr. Subrata Bhattacharjee, Advocate
For the Respondent No.7:Mr. Krishanu Banik, Advocate
IMPORTANT POINT
Expert Engineer – The expert engineer that the respondent/opposite party finished the construction work as per the sanctioned plan and he is in no way deficient in providing service to these complainants.

ORDER

Manojit Mandal, President—This appeal has been filed under section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, ‘the Act’) challenging the order dated 30.04.2019 passed by the Learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hooghly ( in short, ‘the District Forum, now ‘the District Commission’) in connection with consumer case No. CC/197/2014.

2. The appellant and respondent No. 2 being the complainant filed the instant complaint case being No. CC/197/2014 against the respondent/opposite party Sibnath Dutta praying for the following reliefs:—

“(a) pass an order directing the respondent to provide for the facilities of lift and lift room, two-wheeler parking space, underground water reservoir, pump and pump room, complete marble flooring of he staircase, perfect drainage facility for water on the roof, paint with primer of the exterior wall surfaces, coating of the interior wall common surfaces with ‘plaster of paris’, the second staircase and accounts for transformer fees charged;

(b) pass an order of compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakh) only or otherwise Rs.1,20,000/- (Rupees one lakh and twenty thousand) only in respect of each household for mental