Back
RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA, BHARAT KUMAR PANDYA
Saleem Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Sandhya Bansal – Respondent
ORDER
Bharat kumar Pandya, Member.—Heard Mr. Tarique Siddique, Advocate, Ms. Jyotsna Bhardwaj, Advocate, and Mr. Fajallu Rehman, Advocate for complainant. Mr. Salil Paul Advocates for OP-1 and Mr. Rajiv K. Garg and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates for OP-2 and Ms. Diya Kapur, Advocate for OP-3 and Mr. Pradeep Kumar and Ms. Monica Kumar, Advocates for OP-4 and Mr. Ajay Singh, Advocate for OP-5.
2. The Complaint: Ms. Kaushar Jahan died due to medical misconduct & gross negligence of opposite parties (OP-1 and OP-2) on 04.10.2013. On the advice and assurances of OP-1 Dr. Sandhya Bansal, Ms. Kaushar Jahan, was admitted at OP-2 Bansal Hospital on 03.10.2013 vide registration no 13/2780 at 08:00 pm to be operated for ASHERMAN’S SYNDROME on 04.10.2013 early morning by Dr. Sandhya Bansal. Before the operation, the possibility of any complication of ‘air embolism’ was neither explained to the deceased and complainant No.1, nor it was documented. As per OP-2 hospital, the deceased had a cardiac arrest during surgery when the hysteroscope was being removed from the uterine cavity. In the operation theater itself the condition of the patient could not be managed by the doctors due to lack of experti
Standard care - It should be borne in mind that the type of medical service offered, the practitioner’s expertise, training, and experience, and even the location where the treatment took place may a....
Known surgical complications like bowel injury during hysterectomy by qualified doctors do not constitute negligence if due care exercised; Medical Council findings post-remand hold great relevance a....
Injury There is no question of any injured person falsely implicating anyone innocent for such injury in the absence of any previous enmity.
(1) Consumer - A perusal of the web site of JIPMER shows that while free treatment is given to poor persons, charges are liable to be paid by certain category of persons – On facts, the complainants ....
1) Pertinent to mention here that complainant never claimed for any expert’s opinion in dealing with the negligence in his medical treatment.2) In Kusum Sharama and others Vs. Batra Hospital and Medi....
The principle of Res ipsa loquitur establishes medical negligence when wrong drug administration occurs, shifting the burden of proof to the healthcare providers regarding adherence to protocols.
In medical negligence, res ipsa loquitur applies to unexplained post-surgical perforations shifting burden to prove non-negligence; doctor's death abates personal liability against heirs; hospital vi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
