Parulben Shailesbhai Chunara VS Vinaykumar C. Sinh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

J. RAJENDRA
Parulben Shailesbhai Chunara – Appellant
Versus
Vinaykumar C. Sinh – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Dr. SS Hooda and Mr. Aditya Hooda, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Varhsal M. Pancholi, Advocate (Through VC)

ORDER

The present Revision Petition has been filed under Section21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (the “Act”) against impugned order dated 24.09.2015, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujrat (‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. 1673 of 2013. In this appeal, the Respondent/OP appeal was allowed, thereby setting aside the Order dated 10.07.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal, Anand (District Forum”) in CC No. 246 of 2010, wherein the Complaint was allowed.

2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as per positions in the Consumer Complaint before the District Forum. Mrs Parulben Shaileshbhai Chunara is the Complainant and Dr. Vinay kumar C. Sinh, Maltidevi Maternity Hospital is Opposite Party (OP) doctor.

3. In brief, the Complainant, who was pregnant, was under care of the OP doctors from the beginning. Upon admission for delivery to OP hospital on 24.04.2010, she experienced pains on the following day and was taken to labor room. During delivery inexperienced assistants and nurses used inappropriate language and threatened her. After a difficult delivery, the baby boy was born. However, she suffered excessive bleeding

Click Here to Read the rest of this document