NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member and Bharatkumar Pandya, Member
S.K. Gandhi and Ors. – Complainants
versus
Fortis Healthcare Ltd. and Ors. – Opp. Parties
Consumer Case No.812 of 2016
Decided on 10.5.2024
Medical Negligence – Deficiency in Service – Damages with interest – Joint & several liability of OPs – Patient was aged 61 years & had several comorbidities – OP2-doctor found that her condition was serious even then he came in second round after about seven hours – OP3-doctor was informed with ECHO report at 7 but he did not visit the hospital & instructed juniors to attend the patient – Patients go to hospitals of super speciality, on the names of specialist doctors & not on the names of junior doctors – There was no circumstance before doctor-OP3 for not attending the patient on 23.2.2015 – Hospital-OP6 is vicariously liable for the conduct of Ops 2 & 3 & also for allowing fabrication in medical record – Punitive damages of Rs.20 lacs awarded – Ops 2, 3 & 6 are jointly & severally directed to pay compensation of Rs.20/- lacs to complainants, within 2 months from date of judgment with default of interest @ 9%.per annum thereafter.(Paras 17 and 18)
Result: Complaint partly allowed.
ORDER
Heard Ms. Pritha Srikumar, Advocate for the complainants, Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Georgey V.M., Advocate, for opposite parties-1, 5 & 6, Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate, for opposite party-2 and Mr. Alok Gupta, Advocate for opposite party-3. None appeared for opposite
party-4.
2. S.K. Gandhi, his son and daughter have above complaint, for directing the opposite parties jointly and severally to pay (a) damages of Rs.67890000/- with interest @18% p.a. from the date of admission to first opposite party till realization; (c) Rs.10/- lacs as litigation costs; and (iv) any other relief which is deem fit and proper in the fact of the case.
3. The complainants stated that Usha Gandhi (the deceased) was the wife of complainant-1 and mother of complainants-2 & 3. Fortis Escorts Hospital (OP-6) claims to be the best hospital in India, being a part of Pan-Asia Group of integrated healthcare delivery provider, a NABH accredited multi-speciality tertiary care hospital with state of art technology and a high skilled and trained team of medical professionals, providing comprehensive health services. OP-1 claims to be manifestation of Fortis Group’s, who also claims to be most trusted and reliable healthcare service provider, having over 30 years clinical experience in the NCR that its approached is based on teamwork, patient centricity, state-of-art emergency response with highly competent team of specialist doctors, providing un-parallel standard of medical care. OP-2 to 5 were the doctors, posted in OP-1 at the relevant time. Usha Gandhi, aged about 61 years (hereinafter referred to as “the patient”) suffered with acute chest pain and had 2-3 episodes of vomiting. Complainants-1 and 2 took the patient to the Fortis Healthcare Ltd. (OP-1), where she was admitted in the emergency ward at about 8:00 hours on 23.02.2015 with the complaint of chest pain, vomiting and burning sensations in her chest. Complainant-1 accorded his consent, made the required payments and completed all the procedural formalities for admission of the patient. Dr. Naveen Arichwal and Dr. Abubakar (OPs-4 & 5) attended to the patient and prescribed some painkillers and advised electrocardiogram (ECG). Dr. Naveen Arichwal (OP-4) conducted EGC at around 8:26 hours. But the doctors did not take any further action on the basis of ECG report nor informed anything to the complainants about adverse ECG report. They shifted the patient in the ward for further investigation and management. Despite the painkiller being given, the patient did not have any respite from continuous severe discomfort. Dr. G.S. Chhabra (OP-2) visited the ward around 10:00 hours and examined the patient and the papers prepared by OPs-4 & 5. He prescribed number of further tests including bone density, swine flu, echo, chest x-ray and some blood tests, for which, the patient had to go to different departments. In spite of the fact that the patient had severe chest pain, she was not offered any wheel chair. On the repeated requests of complainant-1, a wheel chair was provided to the patient and then remaining tests were conducted. The tests were started around 11:00 hours and continued for about half an hour and during this period the patient continuously had persistent chest pain, discomfort and distress but the medical staff did not pay any attention and told that the doctors would attend the patient in due course. In the ward, she was served lunch at about 12:30 hours but till then her condition further deteriorated and she was unable to eat. Anyhow she took small portion of the meal and started vomiting. Still nobody attended to the patient despite repeated requests of the complainants from the nursing staff to call the doctor but the doctor was not informed on the pretext that the doctor was in OPD. The request of the complainants to show the test reports of the patient was also ignored. Till the evening, the pain and discomfort of the patient increased tremendously. In the eveni
Medical Negligence – Patients go to hospitals of Super Speciality on the names of specialist doctors & not on the names of junior doctors – Hospital charges for the specialist doctors.
(1) Negligence : Essential components of negligence are three. “duty”, “breach” & “resulting damage” .(2) Medical Negligence : Simple lack of care, an error of judgment or an accident is not proof of....
(1) Non Supply of Medical Records – deficiency in service by the Opposite Parties is glaringly apparent with regard to non-supply of copies of the medical records, as sought for by the complainants.
(1) Definition of Negligence – Following the Jacob Mathew and Kusum Sharma precedents, negligence is defined as a breach of duty through omission or commission that a “reasonably competent” professio....
Medical negligence requires evidence of a breach of duty by the medical professional, which was not established in this case.
Critical condition - If the patient was in a critical condition and he could not survive even after surgery, keeping that in mind the blame cannot be passed on to the Hospital and the Doctor who had ....
(1) Medical Board Report - Looking to the Medical Board Report, entire record, Bed Head Ticket of the patient, Commission was of the view that, the patient was given proper care, timely and possible ....
Medical practitioners are not liable for negligence if they followed accepted protocols, and the outcome was due to the patient's pre-existing conditions.
(1) Pancreatitis – Pancreatitis could be detected only much later but OPs cannot be held responsible.(2) Negligence – The patient’s treatment was based on from OP No.3, which further underscores negl....
Medical negligence is defined by a breach of duty. Mere errors in judgment by medical professionals don't equate to negligence if they act within acceptable standards.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.