NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member and
Dr. Sadhna Shanker, Member
New India Assurance
Co. Ltd. and Ors. – Appellants
versus
Kare Suneetha and Ors. – Respondents
First Appeal Nos.755 of 2022, 756 of 2022,
757 of 2022, 758 of 2022, 759 of 2022,
760 of 2022, 761 of 2022 and 762 of 2022
Decided on 19.9.2024
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Section 51 – Insurance Policy – Group Insurance Policy – Personal Accident insurance Policy in respect of employees – Repudiation of claim by Insurance Company not justified – Claim not barred by limitation – Claim in respect of accidental death of husband of respondent No.1 working as foreman, who died in scooter parking area near his house after he left for work – Intimation of death of insured employee was submitted by respondent no. 4 within a week of incident as required under the policy, respondent No.1 cannot be deprived of claim for this reason – Order of State Commission cannot be faulted on grounds that it did not appreciate evidence on record with regard to accidental death of deceased for which claim of insurance had been preferred – No reason to consider conclusion of State Commission to be illegal or perverse which warrants interference – Order of State Commission is confirmed.(Paras 12 to 14)
Result: Disposed of.
ORDER
Subhash Chandra, Presiding Member.—The challenge in this appeal under Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (in short, ‘the Act’) is to the order dated 10.06.2022 in Complaint No.5 of 2019 of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Vijayawada (in short, ‘the State Commission’) allowing the complaint in part and directing OP Nos.1 to 3 (Appellants No.1 to 3 herein) to pay the sum assured under the Group Insurance Policy with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of repudiation till realization along with costs to the Complainant/Respondent No.1 within two months from the date of the order while dismissing the complaint against Opposite Party/Respondent No.4.
2. This order will also dispose of FA nos. 756 to 762 of 2022 which are also related to the same issue, i.e., repudiation of claim under the Group Insurance Policy in question in respect of employees of respondent no.4 on whose behalf the insurance cover for life had been obtained by respondent No.4.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and carefully considered the material on record.
4. For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay, the delay of 85 days in the filing of FA no.755 of 2022 was condoned in the interest of justice.
5. The relevant facts in FA no.755/2022 are that the Respondent No.4, which is a Public Sector Undertaking, had obtained a Group Insurance Policy covering personal accident insurance in respect of its employees called the Personal Accident Insurance Policy (Group) (in short, ‘the Policy’) and paid premium of Rs.7,60,77,419/- including GST vide proposal dated 01.04.2016. Based on the category of the employee, the Policy provided for different amounts of insurance to a life covered. Under this Policy, the insured employees in the Schedules attached to the Policy were covered for accident and injury which was to be verified and certified by a medical practitioner. Coverage included death of the insured person due to “accident” as defined in the Policy outside his/her residence and under a Special Free-Benefit, in addition to the amount payable under Sub Clause 1(a), a lump sum of 2% of capital sum insured or Rs.25,000/-, whichever is less, was payable for transportation of the insured person’s dead body to the place of residence. As per the Policy, an ‘accident’ was defined as a sudden, unforeseen and involuntary event caused by external, visible and violent means. As per the Policy, an ‘injury’ was defined as an accidental, physical bodily harm including illness or disease solely or directly caused by external, violent and visible and evident means which is verified and certified by a medical practitioner. Under the Policy, if such injury, within 12 calendar months of its occurrence, was the sole and direct cause of the death of the insured person, the capital sum insured under the policy was applicable to such person. Exceptions to this policy included the following:—
“Payment of compensation in respect of Death, injury of Disablement of the Insured person (a) from intentional self-injury, suicide or attempted suicide, (b) whilst under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (c) whilst engaging in Aviation or Ballooning whilst mounting into, dismounting from or traveling in any balloon or aircraft other than as a passenger (fare paying or otherwise) in any duly licensed standard type of aircraft anywhere in the world, (d) directly or indirectly caused by venereal diseases, aids or insanity, (e) arising or resulting from the insured person committing any breach of law with criminal intent, (Standard type of Aircraft means any aircraft duly licensed to carry passengers (for hire or otherwise) by appropriate authority irrespective of whether such an aircraft is privately owned OR chartered OR operated by a regular airline OR whether such an aircraft has a single engine or multi engine.
(6) Payment of compensation in respect of Death, Injury or Disablement of the Insured person
Ram Lal & Ors. vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd.
Personal Accident Insurance Policy – Surveyor’s report is not the final word if it can be established that it was arbitrary or perverse.
(1) Failed to discharge the services – The insurer failed to discharge its service obligations by rejecting a genuine claim based on a Chemical Analysis report showing alcohol presence, while ignorin....
Insured is not entitled to compensation when on facts it is proved that he was intoxicated and that his death was due to intoxication.
Insurance co-exists with membership for period of insurance benefit but coverage under insurance would be a direct liability of Insurance company.
1) Mere reading shows that Violation of Policy Conditions written in surveyor’s report are patently ambiguous and incoherent.2) Nothing prevented the insurance co.’s surveyor to confirm from relevant....
Accident – An accident is an occurrence or an event, which is unforeseen and startles one when it takes place but does not startle one when it does not take place. It is not the happening of the expe....
Claim – No claim should be disallowed purely on technical ground or in a mechanical manner; the insurance company should reject the claim only when the insurer finds that it was liable to be rejected....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.