Arnab Gupta VS Ramesh Prasad

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

MANOJIT MANDAL, MRIDULA ROY
Arnab Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Prasad – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. S.N. Ganguly (Advocate)
For the Respondent: Mr. Sibojyoti Chakraborti and
Mr. Sourav Roy, Advocates

ORDER

Manojit Mandal, President—These are two Appeals against the Order dated 15.11.2017 passed by the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Kolkata – Unit – III (South) West Bengal (in short District Commission) in connection with Complaint Case No.CC/88/2016.

2. Shri Ramesh Prasad, Shri Ravi Prasad and Shri Jyoti Prasad and Smt. Lakhi Devi (hereinafter the Complainants) filed the said Consumer Case before the District Commission.

3. The Complainants/Opposite Party No.1, 2, 3 & 4 instituted the Complaint Case being No.CC/88/2016 against the Appellants of both the Appeals and Dr. K.K. Maity, Opposite Party No.1 praying for the following reliefs:

i) To direct the OP nos. 4 and 5 i.e., ESI Hospital and Saroj Gupta Cancer Centre & Research Institute to furnish the entire medical treatment records and/or sheets of the patient, Shankar Prasad for ends of justice.

ii) To direct the OPs to pay a total compensation to the tune of Rs.15,20,000/- (Rupees fifteen lakhs twenty thousand only) for the irreversible loss and damage suffered by the complainants and their family. And

iii) To pall such further order or orders as Your Lordship deems fit and proper.

4. Brief Facts of the Complaint Ca