SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KUMKUM RANI, B. S. MANRAL
Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ghanshyam Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sh. Suresh Gautam, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sh. Amit Agarwal, Advocate

ORDER

Kumkum Rani, President—This appeal has been directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 30.04.2019 passed by learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Dehradun (hereinafter to be referred as “The District Commission”) in consumer complaint No.308 of 2014, styled as Sh. Ghanshyam Agarwal Vs. Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited and others, wherein and whereby the consumer complaint was allowed, directing the appellant / opposite parties to pay Rs.16,20,909/- to the respondent / complainant towards claim amount; Rs.20,000/- towards parking charges; Rs.25,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses, within a period of 30 days’, failing which the respondent / complainant was further held entitled to interest @9% p.a. on the aforesaid sum from the date of filing of the consumer complaint till payment.

2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal, in brief, are, as such that the respondent / complainant is the registered owner of vehicle No.UK09-A-1345, which was insured with the appellant – insurance company vide policy No.010075458400 for the period from 23.3.2013 to 22.03.2014 at an IDV of Rs.16,20,909/-. It was alleged in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top