SUBHASH CHANDRA, J. RAJENDRA
Goyal Energy & Steel Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chairman cum Managing Director – Respondent
JUDGMENT
AVM J. Rajendra, AVSM VSM (Retd.), Member—The Appellant filed the instant First Appeal against the Order dated 29.06.2015 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh (“State Commission’) in Consumer Complaint No.14/15, wherein the State Commission dismissed the Complaint.
2. As per Registry report, there is 13 days delay in filing this Appeal. For reasons stated in IA No.5538/2015 the delay is condoned.
3. For convenience, the parties in the present matter are being referred to as per position held in the Consumer Complaint.
4. Brief facts of the case, as per the complainant, are that the OPs issued a Standard Fire and Special Perils Insurance Policy No.191300/11/2014/221 in favour of the complainant. The said policy remained in force from 12.10.2013 to 11.10.2014 and covered various risks, including a specific coverage of Rs.9,50,00,000/- for loss due to spontaneous combustion of sponge iron, for which an additional premium of Rs.47,500 was paid. In the morning of 04.11.2013, flames were observed emanating from the sponge iron heap at the factory of the complainant by the Production Manager, Mr. Sharad Diwan, who immediately reported the same to Mr.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. M/s. Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.