SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KUMKUM RANI, B. S. MANRAL
National Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Faizal – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sh. Mithun Chandola, Advocate
For the Respondent: None

ORDER

Kumkum Rani, President—This appeal has been directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 24.12.2021 passed by learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nainital (hereinafter to be referred as “The District Commission”) in consumer complaint No. 88 of 2018, styled as Sh. Faizal Vs. M/s National Insurance Company Limited, wherein and whereby the consumer complaint was allowed and the appellant/opposite party was directed to pay compensation of Rs.2,42,588/- to the respondent/complainant on account of loss/damage occasioned to insured vehicle bearing registration No. DL-1V-A7763, within a period of one month from the date of impugned judgment and order, failing which the appellant/opposite party was also held liable to pay interest @6% p.a. on the aforesaid amount from the date of impugned judgment and order till actual payment.

2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal, in brief, are, as such that the respondent/complainant is the registered owner of vehicle bearing registration No. DL-1V-A7763 (bus), which was comprehensively insured with the appellant/opposite party (insurance company) vide policy No. 461800/31/16/6300003447, which was valid for th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top