KUMKUM RANI, B. S. MANRAL
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Babita – Respondent
ORDER
Kumkum Rani, President.—These three appeals filed under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 have been directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 30.01.2020 passed by learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Haridwar (hereinafter to be referred as “The District Commission”) in consumer complaint No. 305 of 2017, styled as Smt. Babita Vs. Chief Medical Officer, Haridwar and others, wherein and whereby the consumer complaint was allowed and the opposite party Nos. 2 to 4 to the consumer complaint, i.e., Manager, Metro Hospital and Heart Institute; Dr. Tarushree and Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited respectively, were directed to pay an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- to respondent No.1 / complainant - Smt. Babita towards treatment expenses and delivery expenses etc. together with Rs. 10,00,000/- towards nurturing & education of the child born after sterilization operation and Rs. 1,00,000/- towards mental agony, in all, Rs. 13,00,000/- along with interest @6% p.a. from the date of filing of the consumer complaint, i.e., 14.11.2017 till actual payment. The consumer complaint was, however, dismissed against opposite party No. 1 - Chief Med
Medical Negligence – Methods of sterilization / tubectomy are not 100% safe and secure.
The burden lies on the defendants to prove that there was no negligence in cases of failed sterilization operation. The court also emphasized the need for the State Government to devise provisions fo....
Failure of sterilization does not automatically constitute negligence; liability exists only with proof of malpractice, not merely based on resultant pregnancy.
Medical officers are liable for negligence in family planning operations, especially if their failure causes unexpected pregnancies, resulting in financial burden.
Medical Negligence – Negligence alleged should be so glaring, in which event principle of res ipsa loquitur could be made applicable & not based on perception.
Medical professionals cannot be held liable for sterilisation failures due to natural causes when they adhere to accepted medical standards and inform patients of inherent risks.
The judgment emphasizes the need to establish negligence or carelessness on the part of the medical practitioner in failed sterilization cases, highlighting the burden of proof on the plaintiff and t....
Failed tubectomy surgery due to natural causes does not constitute medical negligence, and compensation cannot be claimed for maintenance and upbringing of the child.
Compensation for unwanted pregnancies post-sterilization requires proof of medical negligence; otherwise, claims are unsustainable.
Where death of the patient related back to her operation for medical termination of pregnancy and also for tubectomy operation the claimants would be entitled to compensation on account of medical n....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.