My Booster Retails Pvt. Ltd. VS Raj Kumar Tiwari

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

J. RAJENDRA, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
My Booster Retails Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Tiwari – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Palash S. Singhai, Advocate, Mr. Marshal Sareen, Advocate

ORDER

As per the record of the Registry, there is a delay of 124 days in filing this Second Appeal. Accordingly IA/14763/2025 has been filed by the Appellant seeking Condonation of delay.

2. In the said Application, the learned counsel for the Appellant has stated following grounds for the delay in filing of the instant Appeal:

a. That the delay was caused despite the bona fide attempts of the Appellant, and the Appellant has taken all possible steps to minimize the delay. That very effort was made to expedite the process of filing the appeal once the decision to challenge the Impugned Order was taken.

b. That it took considerable time for the Applicant/Appellant to engage a suitable counsel based in Delhi to represent the Applicant before this Hon’ble Commission. The Applicant/ Appellant is based in Pune, Maharashtra, and the process of 1 SA/830/2025 engaging a competent legal professional in a different city took some time, which contributed to the delay in preparing and filing the appeal before this Hon’ble Commission.

c. Further, it also took substantial time to procure the necessary documents from the earlier counsel who had represented the Applicant/Appellant before the