SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA, AVM J. RAJENDRA
Toralben Prakash Patel – Appellant
Versus
Future General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Taksh Suri, Advocate (VC)

ORDER

It is seen from the record that the Appeal was filed on 29.05.2023. Thereafter, the Registry observed certain defects and notified the same to the appellant. On 19.06.2023, the matter was listed before Assistant Registrar and the appellant was granted seven weeks’ time to cure defects. Thereafter, on 18.08.2023, as the defects were not cured, again five weeks’ more time was given to the appellant to cure the defects. On 18.10.2023, the defects still were not cured and the appellant was again granted four weeks’ time to cure the defects. On 08.12.2023, the appellant again sought and was allowed four weeks’ time to cure the defects and the matter was listed before the Bench for admission hearing on 11.01.2024. On 11.01.2024, appellant was directed to appear before the Registrar on 02.02.2024 for removal of defects. On 02.02.2024, the appellant sought and was granted five weeks’ time to cure defects and the matter was again listed before Bench on 20.03.2024. On 20.03.2024, the counsel for appellant undertook to file a better affidavit for explaining the delay and was granted four weeks’ time. On 06.09.2024, as prayed, fifteen days further time was allowed to the counsel for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top