Back
KALYANI KAPSE, SHAILA D. WANDHARE
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Manager – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Laxmikant Kasture – Respondent
ORDER
S.D. Wandhare, Member—The appellant namely Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd through its Manager, has preferred the present appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 challenging the order passed on 30/07/2018 in Consumer Complaint No.CC/98/2014 (hereinafter it is referred to in short as “impugned order”) of the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Buldhana (hereinafter it is referred to in short as “learned District Forum”) by which the complaint filed by respondent No.1 /org. complainant came to be allowed. The parties of the appeal are hereinafter referred to by their original nomenclature as complainant and opposite parties respectively for better appreciation.
2. The facts that emerge from the original complaint are that the complainant had purchased a Maruti Ritz vehicle bearing No.MH-28-V-5170 on 19/12/2012 for Rs.6,63,000/- from Opposite Party (O.P.) No.2. Said vehicle was covered under a comprehensive insurance policy bearing No.0G-13-2002-1801-00003866 of Rs.5,33,880/- issued by O.P. No.1 after payment of premium of Rs.16803/- for the period from 19/12/2012 to 18/12/2013. On 05/05/2013, while the complainant was travelling from Na
(1) Delay in Intimation – A technical breach, such as a delay in intimating the accident (in this case, alleged 240 days), cannot automatically defeat the substantive rights of the insured. If the de....
1. Delay in filing FIR and insurance claim to be condoned if reasonable explanation given, especially in case of theft of vehicle.2. Mere delay cannot be a reason for not providing claim as per Apex....
Revisional Jurisdiction of NC – Concurrent findings given by Forum & State Commission : No illegality or material irregularity: NC has no jurisdiction to interfere with concurrent findings recorded b....
The absence of a route permit did not entitle the insurance company to repudiate the claim in its entirety, and the claim could be settled at 75% of the assessed damage to the vehicle on a non-standa....
Insurance Policy – Vehicle Insurance – Theft – Insurance Company cannot travel beyond the reasons stated in repudiation letter.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
