SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Guj) 51

B.K.MEHTA, D.H.SHUKLA
RAJKOT ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.M.THAKAR, R.KRISHNA MURTHY

B. K. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) SINCE common questions of law and facts arise in these two petitions we intend to dispose them of by this common judgment though we will shortly set out the relevant facts and circumstances in which the respective petitioners have moved those petitions challenging the validity of sec. 44ab of the Income-tax Act 1961 which has been placed on the statute book by Finance Act 1984 with effect from 1/04/1985 and Rule 6g as well as forms 3ca to 3 of the Income-tax (Amendment) Rules 1985 promulgated on 31/01/1985 and made effective from 1/04/1985 and sec. 271b providing penalty for not getting the accounts audited broadly on the ground of the impugned provisions being violative of Arts. 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution and consequently therefore praying for appropriate writs orders and directions to quash and set aside the said provisions.

( 2 ) SPECIAL Civil Application No. 068/85 has been moved by two registered associations of Engineers and Oil Millers being petitioners Nos. 1 and 2 respectively having membership of more than 500 and 250 persons respectively as well as by different partnership firms being petitioners Nos. 3 to 6 carrying on business in differe

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top