J.M.PANCHAL
GUNVANTLAL MANEKCHAND – Appellant
Versus
ATUL KUMAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THE respondent who is original plaintiff had filed Summary suit No. 4757 of 1982 in the Small Causes Court at Ahmedabad for the purpose of recovering an amount of Rs. 1,726. 50 from the petitioner who was original defendant in that suit. The learned Judge decreed the suit by judgment and order dated 19/06/1984. Therefore, an application against the order dated 28-3-1985 passed by the Appellate Bench. Small Cause Court, ahmedabad rejecting an application to set aside the judgment and decree passed by a Judge of that Court. for new trial under Sec. 38 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 was filed by the present petitioner before the Appellate Bench of the Small causes Court with a prayer to set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Judge and to hold a fresh trial. The said application was filed on 3/07/1984 and was registered as New Trial Application No. 23 of 1984. The Appellate Bench relied on the case of E. C. Pareira v. Somani and Co. Ltd. , 60 BLR 1369 and came to the conclusion that a period of limitation for filing an application under Sec. 38 is governed by Sec. 38 itself and no power is given either under the Limitation Act or under
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.