SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 237

C.K.THAKKER
RAMESHCHANDRA K. PATWA – Appellant
Versus
VITHALDAS CHIMANLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: S.N.Soparkar, V.P.Shah

C. K. THAKKER, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision Application is filed by the petitioners-original defendants 1 to 5 against the decree of eviction passed by the trial Court and confirmed by the Appellate Court.

( 2 ) TO appreciate the controversy in question, few relevant facts may now be stated. The opponents-plaintiffs filed H. R. P. Suit No. 137 of 1973 in the Small Causes Court at Ahmedabad against the petitioners and one S. D. Shah and Co. (defendant 6) to recover possession of the suit premises bearing Municipal Census No. 1956 situated opposite English Cinema, Khadia, Ahmedabad, inter alia on the ground that defendants 2 and 3 who were the lawful tenants of the suit property had illegally and unlawfully sub-let a portion thereof to defendants 4 to 6. It was also alleged that defendants 2 and 3 were in arrears of rent from 1/10/1971, and they had committed breach of terms of tenancy. On those allegations, the tenancy of the defendants was terminated by a registered notice and they were called upon to vacate the premises. Since they did not comply with the notice, a suit came to be filed for possession of the suit property.

( 3 ) DEFENDANTS 2, 3 and 4 appeared and filed joint written stat



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top