R.K.ABICHANDANI, S.NAINAR SUNDARAM, SHARAD D.DAVE
MOHMAD AYUB – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent
( 1 ) FOR himself for R. K. ABICHANDANI, j. (Majority view) : The question that stands referred to us, as a Full Bench, for our consideration and answer, runs as follows: "whether the cases for the offences punishable under Chapters XVI and XVII of the I. P. C. and Chapter V of the Arms Act, 1959, pending investigation can be taken into consideration for arriving at the subjective satisfaction as to whether a person is a dangerous person within the meaning of Sec. 2 (c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985?" the need for the reference arose, because, B. S. Kapadia and N. J. Pandya, jj. , who have made the reference, found themselves not in a position to agree with the view of the Bench of C. V. Jani and (one of us), S. D. Dave, JJ. , in shamjibhai Manjibhai Patel v. Commissioner of Police, City of Ahmedabad and anr. , 1992 (2) XXXIII (2) GLR 1360. wherein it was opined :". . . . . . . . . it shall have to be accepted that the detaining authority could not have utilised the registration of the abovesaid 4 Criminal Cases against the petitioner-detenu, because at the relevant time they were all under investigation. "the Bench, in Shamjibh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.