R.K.ABICHANDANI, S.NAINAR SUNDARAM, SHARAD D.DAVE
P. D. WAGHELA – Appellant
Versus
G. C. RAIGER – Respondent
( 1 ) THE question, we, as a Full Bench, are being called upon to dscide, turns on the interpretation that should be put on the expression conviction, found in clause (a) of the second proviso to clause (2) of Art. 311 of the Constitution of India. The question is would the conviction at the hands of a competent Criminal Court in the first instance suffice, or should the conviction await confirmation at the hands of a final or ultimate competent Criminal Court ? The placement of clause (a) of the second proviso to clause (2) of Art. 311 will stand better appreciated if the entire Art. 311, as it stands in the Statute Book, is extracted as follows :"311. (1) No person who is a member of a civil service of the Union or an all India service or a civil service of a State or holds a civil post under the Union or a State shall be dismissed or removed by an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed. (2) No such person as aforesaid shall be dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of these charges : provided that wh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.