SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 491

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :R.K.Abichandani, R.R.Jain
STATE OF GUJARAT - Appellant
Versus
SHANKERJI CHATURJI - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL 1194 of 984
Decided On : 10/08/1996

Advocates Appeared: M.C.BHATT, S.R.DIVETIA

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 325 and 337 – Assualt – Dispute over Land – Acquittal appeal was admitted and is heard against accused as it was not pressed against rest of respondents as recorded in admission order – Appeal is directed against acquittal of these accused persons who were tried for offences under S. 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 325 and 337 of Indian Penal Code – Held, Court is inclined to take a lenient view of matter and Court make the following order :order 1. Each of the convicted accused persons is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and pay fine each for the offence under S. 307 read with S. 149 of the I. P. C. – Each of convicted accused persons is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 months for offence under S. 323 of I. P. C. read with S. 149 of I. P. C. 6 –Each of convicted accused persons is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence under S. 337 of I. P. C. read with S. 149 of I. P. C. – Order Accordingly (Para 24)

R. K. ABICHANDANI, J.

( 1 ) ). This acquittal appeal was admitted and is heard against the accused Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 14 to 17, 21 and 22 as it was not pressed against rest of the respondents as recorded in the admission order dated 4-3-1986. This appeal is directed against the acquittal of these accused persons who were tried for the offences under S. 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 325 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) ). The prosecution version is that on 10-9-1983, at about 9 or 9-30 A. M. , the complainant Gandaji Thakor alongwith Jakshibhai Valjibhai Rabari, Raghunathbhai khodabhai Rabari, Bhagwanbhai Nathabhai Rabari and Ranaji Jenaji Thakor had gone from village Moraiya to Bavla in a tractor driven by Vithalbhai, to sell 165 maunds of paddy which belonged to Harjibhai Nathabhai. They reached Bavla around 10-10. 30 A. M. After selling the paddy, making some purchases and taking snacks, they started for the return journey from Bavla around 1-45 P. M. At that time driver vithalbhai Chhotabhai Vasava was driving the tractor and the complainant Gandaji was sitting by his side and others were sitting in the trolly attached with the tractor. When they reached near village Pilupura, at around 3 P. M. , they were intercepted by Thakors and Bharwads of Pipulura by placing their tractor on the road against the tractor of the complainants side. They were around 60 to 70 in number, armed with dharias, kodalis, spades, spears, sticks and other weapons. The prosecution version is that at that time their assailants started pelting stones, one of which hit the driver Vithalbhai on his head. The tractor was, therefore, taken by the driver on the side of the road and it slided down the slope into a "chokdi". These persons, therefore, alighted from the trolly and statrted running to save themselves. According to the prosecution, 22 persons were identified from the assailants who were charged as the accused. These persons had caused serious injuries to Jakshibhai Valjibhai Rabari, Raghunathbhai Khodabhai Rabari and Bhagwanbhai nathathai Rabari by deadly weapons as a result of which they fell down. They also caused injuries to Raghunathbhai, the complainant Gandaji and the driver Vithalbhai, who then escaped from that spot. It is alleged that Gandaji had witnessed the entire incident from behind a nearby bush. According to prosecution case, after attacking the injured persons, the assailants had run away. Thereafter, while the complainant was going towards their village Moraiya, he met one Maljibhai Govindbhai and ramjibhai Thobanbhai coming in a tractor in which driver Vithalbhai and Ranaji jenaji were also there. He also got into the tractor and they proceeded towards their village. They then met Harjibhai Nathabhai and Chandubhai driver in a matador who were coming from Ahmedabad. Thereafter, they went to the place of the incident where Jakshibhai, Raghunathbhai and Bhagwanbhai were lying with serious injuries in a ditch. These injured persons were then taken in the matador to the hospital at Sanand for treatment. The complaint was filed on the same day at 5-15 P. M. , at Sanand Police station, i. e. , within about 2 1/2 hours of the incident. Charge-sheet was submitted against 22 accused persons on 20-12-1983 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sanand, for the aforesaid offences. As the offence under S. 307 of the Indian Penal Code was triable by the Sessions Court, the learned Magistrate, on 13-1-1984 committed the case to the Court of Session. The charge against the accused was framed on 23-4-1984 by the Sessions Court and all the 22 accused pleaded not guilty to the charge levelled against them.

( 3 ) ). The defence version was that there was prior enmity between the parties on account of a dispute in respect of the land known as "moraiya Farm. There were several cases filed by Harjivan Nathabhai, who is brother of Bhagwanbhai nathabhai, against some of the accused persons and others and only some time back some of the
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top