SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 555

R.M.DOSHIT
RAMBADAN R. SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRIC SUPRINTENDENT OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.SHASTRI, D.A.Bhambhania

R. M. DOSHIT, J.

( 1 ) BOTH the petitioners were armed constables who are convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Mehsana by his judgment and order dated 14th March, 1991 for the offence committed under Secs. 302, 307 and 114 of the indian Penal Code. Both the petitioners have been sentenced, inter-alia, to suffer rigorous Imprisonment for five years. Feeling aggrieved by their conviction, the petitioners have preferred Criminal Appeal No. 157 of 1991 before this Court. Said appeal is admitted by this Court and the petitioners have been released on bail.

( 2 ) WHILE the petitioners were serving as armed police constables on 27th June, 1989, they opened firing which resulted into death of member of public. It is for commission of this offence, the petitioners have been convicted as aforesaid. Pursuant to the said conviction, the petitioners have been dismissed from service under orders dated 6th February, 1993, made by the District Superintendent of police, Mehsana.

( 3 ) THE petitioners have preferred this petition against the above referred orders of dismissal from service made on 6th February, 1993. Learned Advocate mr. Shastri has appeared for the petitioners and has contended t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top