N.N.MATHUR
B. PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) BOTH these Revision Applications under Sec. 12 of the gujarat Public Works Contract Act, 1992, (In short, the Act of 1992) are filed against the order of the Tribunal rejecting the reference barred by lapse of time. As a common question of law arises, they are disposed of by this common order. The necessary facts are set out as follows :- c. R. A. No. 1283 of 1996 the petitioner-contractor was granted contract for construction of rural roads upto S. T. stage including C. D. works in Mehsana District. The work order was issued on 11-9-1989. He did not complete the work within the stipulated period, i. e. , by 10-3-1991 but completed on 31-7-1992. The petitioners Advocate served a notice dated 7-9-1994 on the Executive Engineer to settle the disputes under clause 51 of the General Conditions of the contract. The petitioner also addressed an appeal to the Chief Engineer on 22-10-1994 under clause 51. The Executive Engineer, by his letter dated 16-12-1994 informed the petitioner that there was no dispute covered by clause 51 required to be decided by him. The plea was also taken that clause 51 is intended to be resorted promptly while the work is in progress so th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.