SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 378

S.D.PANDIT
J. B. TRANSPORT COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
SHANKARLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MUKUL SINHA, SUKHVASI B.SHARMA

S. D. PANDIT, J.

( 1 ) M/s. J. B. Transport Company-a proprietary concern and its proprietor have filed the present petition to challenge the order passed by the Labour Court of Ahmedabad in Reference No. 428 of 1997.

( 2 ) THE respondent Shankarlal @ Mavaram Nathuji Patel is working as driver with the petitioner. His employment was terminated on 25/11/1994 hence he raised an industrial dispute which resulted in Reference No. 428 of 1997. In the said reference, the present petitioner initially filed a Vakalatnama on their behalf through their Advocate Mr. S. B. Sharma which is at Exh. 9 in the said reference. The workman raised an objection for the appearance of a practising Advocate. Thereafter, another document purporting to be an authorisation was filed in the said reference and along with that authorisation the Annexure c of this petition and annexure d certificate of registration under Trade Unions Act, at Page 35 were produced before the Labour Court. Even after filing of this authorisation the workman raised a contention before the Labour Court saying that he was raising objection under Sec. 36 (4) of the Industrial Disputes Act. It was contended on behalf of the workman that









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top