SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 588

M.S.PARIKH
UNJHA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.PANDEY, J.M.THAKAR, K.S.JAVERI, M.D.PANDYA, P.G.DESAI, P.K.JANIKIRAN

M. S. PARIKH, J.

( 1 ) IN the main matter the petitioners have come out with following prayer :". . . to issue a writ of mandamus or writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writ or direction or order quashing and setting aside the Notification dated 20th april, 1998, at Annexure D to the petition and the order dated 21/04/1998, at Annexure C to the petition and be pleased to direct the respondents to restore the position prevailing on 19/04/1998 prior to passing of the order dated 20th april, 1998. "

( 2 ) I have heard Mr. S, K. Jhaveri, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, Mr. J. M. Thakore, learned Advocate General with Mr. P. G. Desai, learned Government Pleader for the respondent No. 1 -State and Mr. M. D. Pandya, learned Advocate for the rest of the respondents. Mr. Jhaveri has submitted that following points arise for consideration in this petition : (I) Whether on constituting two market committees by the order dated 31-1-1997, the power, if any, conferred upon the State Government under Sec. 54 is exhausted ? (II) Whether the State Government has power to remove the members of the market committee constituted as per Annexure A under Sec. 54 before the completi

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top