SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 737

ANIL R.DAVE
SAIYAD NASIRUDDIN SAIYADALI – Appellant
Versus
KUBRABEGUM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: R.N.SHAH

A. R. DAVE, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition under the provisions of Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the validity of an order passed in Revision Application No. TEN. B. S. 105/92 dated 20. 2. 99 passed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal. By virtue of the said order, the tribunal has confirmed the order passed by the Mamlatdar and ALT in Tenancy Case No. 10372/82 dated 3. 5. 91 and order dated 17. 5. 92 passed by the Deputy Collector, Navsari in Tenancy Appeal No. 28/91.

( 2 ) THE facts pertaining to the case are as under. The petitioner was claiming to be a tenant in respect of lands bearing Blocks Nos. 147, 247, 146 and 148 situated at Village: Munsad and had therefore submitted an application under the provisions of sec. 70 (b) and sec. 70 (nb) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The said application was rejected by the Mamlatdar and ALT by his order dated 3. 5. 91 on the ground that the petitioner was having family relation with the respondents and therefore he could not have been declared a tenant in respect of the land in question. The said order was challenged by the petitioner by filing Tenan
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top