SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Guj) 286

H.K.RATHOD
STATE TRADE CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUSHILA PREMJIBHAI MAJITHIYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.L.RAVAL, P.M.THAKKAR

H. K. RATHOD, J.

( 1 ) `one of the eternal conflicts out of which life is made up is that between the efforts of every man to get the most he can for his services, and that of a society, disguised under the name of Capital, to get his services for the least possible return. Combination on the one side is patent and powerful. Combination on the other is necessary and desirable counter part, if the battle is to be carried on in a fair and equitable way. . Justice Holmes.

( 2 ) HEARD the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.

( 3 ) THE brief facts of the present writ petition are that the respondents - two workmen namely Sushila Premjibhai Majithiya and Shardaben C. Katariya [reference Nos. 67/83 and 68/83 respectively] were working with the petitioner-State Trading Corporation of India Limited [hereinafter referred to as, `the Corporation] with effect from 4th December, 1980 and their services were illegally terminated by the petitioner-Corporation with effect from 25th June, 1982 and 30th June, 1982 respectively. Being aggrieved by the said orders of termination, both the workmen moved the Labour Court, Rajkot vide Reference Nos. 67/83 and 68/83 respectively and the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top