SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Guj) 538

K.R.VYAS, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
ATUL TRADING CO – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: BIPIN I.MEHTA, C.L.SONI, J.S.Yadav, KAVITA YADAV, MANISHA LAV KUMAR SHAH, R.C.Jani, S.B.VAKIL

DM DHARMADHIKARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS group of Letters Patent Appeals has been preferred against the common order dated 15. 9. 2000, 19. 1. 2001 and 20. 1. 2001 passed by the learned Single Judge rejecting special civil applications filed by the wholesale dealers in essential commodity- kerosene. Notice was issued on the appeals and the learned counsel for the appellants and respondent State and its authorities were heard at length on the merits of the case. With their consent, the appeals are being finally decided by this common order.

( 2 ) ALL the appellants-petitioners who are wholesale dealers in essential commodity- kerosene are aggrieved by the impugned policy decision contained in the circulars of the State Government of Gujarat dated 30. 7. 1988, 4. 10. 1990, 3. 4. 1995, 6. 1. 1997, 29. 8. 1997, 22. 1. 1999, 5. 2. 2001 and 19. 6. 2001.

( 3 ) THE appellants are holding wholesale dealers licences for essential commodity- kerosene in accordance with the provisions of the Gujarat Essential Articles (Licensing, Control and Stock Declaration) Order,1981 which is issued in exercise of powers of the State of Gujarat delegated to it by the Central Government in accordance with section 5 r































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top