A.P.SEN, A.V.VARADARAJAN, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
K. Ramanathan – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent
Judgment
SEN, J. :- This appeal by special leave directed against the judgment and order of the Madras High Court dated September 14, 1983 raises a question of some complexity. The question is as to whether cl. 3(1A) of the Tamil Nadu Paddy (Restriction on Movement) Order, 1982 issued by the State Government under S. 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with the Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture (Department of Food) Order, G.S.R. 800 dated June 9, 1978, with the prior concurrence of the Government of India, was ultra vires the State Government being in excess of its delegated powers. That depends on whether the delegation of a specific power under cl. (d) of sub-s. (2) of S. 3 of the Act by the aforesaid notification issued by the Central Government under S. 5 to regulate the storage, transport, distribution, disposal, acquisition, use or consumption of an essential commodity, in relation to foodstuffs, carries with it the general powers of the Central Government under sub-s. (1) of S. 3 of the Act to regulate or prohibit the production, supply and distribution of essential commodities and trade and commerce therein. There is a conflict of opinion on this questio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.