SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Guj) 101

J.M.PANCHAL, J.R.VORA
Raghubhai Gandabhai Bharwad – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: Nandini Joshi, Rajesh M.Agrawal, Sunil M.Agrawal

J. M. PANCHAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal, which is filed under Sec. 374 (2) of the Code of criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order dated december 21, 2001, rendered by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge. Court no. 7. Ahmedabad City, in Sessions Case No. 115/2001, by which the appellant is convicted under Sec. 17 and Sec. 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances act, 1985 ("the NDPS Act" for short) and punished with R. I. for 10 years and fine of rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) i/d. R. I. for one year for the offence punishable under Sec. 17 of the NDPS Act as well as R. I. for 10 years and fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One lac) i/d. R. I. for one year for the offence punishable under Sec. 18 of the NDPS Act. We may state that learned Judge has not directed that the punishments imposed on the appellant shall run concurrently and, therefore, in view of the provisions of Sec. 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the effect of imposition of punishment of imprisonment is that the punishments consisting of imprisonment will commence one after the expiration of the other.

( 2 ) ON June 10, 2001, informer of police constable Himatsinh Lal

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top