SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 99

A.M.KAPADIA, H.H.MEHTA
HUSEN BHENU MALAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ASIM J.PANDYA, B.D.DESAI, G.RAMAKRISHNAIAH

A. M. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal which is filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code for short) read with Section 36-B of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the NDPS Act for short) through jail, is directed against a judgment and order dated February 4, 1997 rendered by Special Judge, Kachchh at Bhuj, in Special Case No. 122 of 1994 by which appellants/original accused Nos. 1 to 5 (the accused for short) have been convicted of the offences under Section 20 (b) (ii) read with Section 29 of the NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo R. I. for 15 years and fine of Rs. 1 lakh, i. d. , S. I. for two years whereas A-1 and A-4 have also been convicted of the offences punishable under Section 23 read with Section 29 of the NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo R. I. for 15 years and fine of Rs. 1 lakh i. d. , S. I. for two years. It is also ordered by the learned Special Judge that both the sentences awarded to A-1 and A-4 to run concurrently and all the five accused are given the benefit of set-off.

( 2 ) FACTS of the case have been detailed in the judgment of the learned Special Judge and, therefore, it is not expedient to repeat the sam
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top