K.M.MEHTA
RAJENDRASINH BHARATSINH SARVAIYA – Appellant
Versus
KIRITSINH BALVANTSINH JADEJA – Respondent
( 1 ) ). RULE. Mr. B. T. Rao, learned advocate for respondent No. 1, waives service of rule. 1. 1 rajendrasinh Bharatsinh Sarvaiya, petitioner, original third party, has filed this Revision Application under Section 115 of the C. P. C. , challenging the judgement and order dated 11. 2. 2002 passed by the Second Joint Civil Judge (S. D.), Bhavnagar - order below Exh. 12 in Regular Civil Suit No. 465 of 2001. The learned Judge by his impugned judgement was pleased to reject the application at Exh. 12 filed by the petitioner for joining as party defendant under the provisions of Order 1 Rule 10 of the C. P. C.
( 2 ) THERE is a property situated at Krishnanagar, near Manekwadi, on Municipal Leasehold plot bearing Survey No. 558-559/b, admeasuring 719. 56 sq. mtr. at Bhavnagar (hereinafter referred to as "the suit property". BACKGROUND OF THE MATTER:
( 3 ) DINESHBHAI Rajaram Makwana and Rajeshbhai Rajaram Makwana purchased the suit property from one Mr. Bhogilal Prahladbhai Patel of Vallabhbhai and Savitaben Patel on 23. 8. 1991 by registered Sale Deed and thereby they became owner of the said suit property. 3. 1 it appears from the record that Shri Dineshbhai Rajaram and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.