H.K.RATHOD, BHAWANI SINGH
SOUTH GUJARAT UNIVERSITY – Appellant
Versus
DILIP C. SHAH – Respondent
( 1 ) ADMIT. Mr. Utpal M. Panchal, learned counsel for the respondent, waives service. On the request of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
( 2 ) THROUGH this Letters Patent Appeal, order of the learned Single Judge dated 22-03-2004 passed in Special Civil Application No. 3550 of 2004 is challenged by the appellant-South Gujarat University.
( 3 ) IN exercise of powers under Section 11 (4) (a) of South Gujarat University Act, 1965, Controller of Examinations (respondent) was suspended by the Vice Chancellor of the University on October 22, 2003. The order was challenged by the respondent through Application No. 35 of 2003 before the Gujarat Universities Services Tribunal, constituted under the Gujarat Universities Services Tribunal Act, 1983. By interim order dated 04-11-2003 passed in Application No. 35 of 2003, the Tribunal directed the appellant to call ordinary meeting of the Syndicate before 18-11-2003, and to inform about the action taken by the Vice Chancellor. It was left open for the respondent to prefer Appeal to the Syndicate on or before 07-11-200
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.