SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 384

A.M.KAPADIA
HASHMIKANT M SHETH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.M.AMIN, MAHENDRA K.PATEL, VIPUL M.PANCHOLI

A. M. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code for short) the petitioner against whom Criminal Complaint bearing No. 558 of 2003 is filed in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ahmedabad (Rural) for commission of alleged offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (the Act for short) in which process has been issued, has prayed to quash and set aside the complaint and process issued thereunder, on the grounds stated in the petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the original accused whereas respondent No. 2 is the original complainant in the above referred criminal complaint. Therefore, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the petitioner is referred to as "the accused" whereas respondent No. 2 is referred to as "the complainant" hereinafter in this judgment.

( 3 ) AS per the averments made in the petition, the accused came in contact with the complainant and therefore as and when the accused was in need of money he used to borrow money from the complainant. The transaction started between both of them since 1992-93 and the last transaction between them took place in the year 1998. In that conn































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top