SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 430

H.K.RATHOD
GEMABHAI ABAHYSINH BARIA – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: TEJAS M.BAROT

( 1 ) HEARD learned Advocate Mr. Mihir Thakor with Mr. Tejas M. Barot for petitioners in this group of petitions. This group of petitions was earlier circulated before the service bench of this Court (Coram : Hon ble Mr. Justice D. H. Waghela,j.) on 21. 7. 2006. The order passed is reproduced as under:"although there is no mention of any labour law in the cause title and the learned counsel is thoroughly confused in his submissions about the grievance and alleged violation of any particular law or rules, he asserted and insisted that these were matters under the labour laws and may be sent for hearing by the appropriate Bench. Accordingly, at the instance of the learned counsel, the office is requested to place these matters before the Court taking up labour matters. Such practice of circulating the matter for admission and urgent orders in the form of service matter and then insisting upon its transfer to another Bench is deprecated in view of the waste of time and energy, not to mention the harmful effect likely to be caused to the unwary petitioners. "

( 2 ) BEFORE the service bench of this Court, contention was raised by the petitioners that the present group of petitions perta
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top