SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 419

H.N.DEVANI
SWIL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING GROUP LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.R.GUPTA, AMRITA THAKORE, MIHIR JOSHI, NITA PANCHAL

( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 28th February, 2003 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court, rejecting the Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 771 of 2001 filed by the petitioner for setting aside the exparte judgement and decree dated 28th January, 2000 passed against it in Summary Suit No. 4206 of 1999 filed by the respondent for recovery of an amount of Rs. 3,33,368/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 1st August, 1999.

( 2 ) THE respondent herein instituted Summary Suit No. 4206 of 1999 against the petitioner Company on 23rd August, 1999 for recovery of an amount of Rs. 3,33,368/- with costs and interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 1st August, 1999 till payment thereof. It is the case of the petitioner that no process fee was paid by the respondent for service of summons, but an application was made by respondent to serve the summons of the above suit on the petitioner by substituted service " RPAD which was allowed by the Court. It is further the case of the petitioner that, on 3rd January, 2000, summons was sent to the factory of the petitioner at





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top