( 1 ) HEARD the learned Advocate, Mr. H. S. Munshaw, appearing on behalf of petitioner Corporation.

( 2 ) IN the present petition, the petitioner " Corporation has challenged the award passed by Labour Court, Surendranagar in Reference Demand No. 2 of 1999 dated 9. 1. 2006, whereby, the Labour Court has granted regular pay scale to the respondent workman in the post of Civil Supervisor and with consequential benefits w. e. f. 1. 9. 1994. The Labour Court has also made it clear that no difference of salary of scale of Civil Supervisor and consequential benefits should have to be paid to the workman. Meaning thereby that the respondent workman is not entitled to any difference of salary or arrears of salary w. e. f. 1. 9. 1994, but petitioner Corporation has to implement the award within a period of 30 days from the date of publication.

( 3 ) LEARNED Advocate, Mr. Munshaw, appearing on behalf of petitioner " Corporation, submitted that respondent workman was not eligible for any relief and his appointment is without procedure. The respondent workman was temporary / ad-hoc / time bound appointed. He also submitted that there is no sanctioned / vacant post of Civil Supervisor available

Click Here to Read the rest of this document