SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 319

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :AKIL KURESHI
BHAVYA S.DESAI - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - Respondent
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION 11340 Of 2006
Decided On : 06/17/2006

Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, HEMANG RAVAL, K.B.TRIVEDI, MITUL K.SHELAT, N.D.NANAVATI, SANGITA VISHEN

Headnote:

Education law - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 14 - Gujarat and recognized by Council of Indian School of Certificate Examinations - In order to appreciate controversy arising necessary facts need to be noted at this stage - Special Civil Application and connected matters have been filed as noted above by students pursuing their studies in schools affiliated with Central Board - These petitioners may be conveniently referred to are Central Board students - Petitioners of Special Civil Application of students who have appeared in their class examination conducted by Board called CBSE - They are eligible to apply for medical or Para-medical courses or engineering or related subjects as per the choice of their subjects - in various professional courses run by several institutes in State – Petitioner are students who have appeared in standard in their respective schools which are affiliated to Central Board – Held, This Court had perceived need for a clear and well publicized Government policy in this regard - Observations made by Judge in this regard can be noted next ground of challenge is that since Rule was enacted after last date for filing applications for admission had expired it could not have been validly enacted more so because it altered position as existing on such date and in that manner affected and altered settled rights by retrospective operation - Now it might be clarified at outset that though State Government has every right to frame rules regulating admission to Government colleges based on certain rational policy and to amend them if occasion arises to remove any defect or lacuna it would be always desirable to formulate and finalize such rules with precision well in advance and to make rules relating to admission known to intending applicants at a point of item reasonably anterior last date of admission - In a society governed by rule of law certain basic principles must be observed - One of such principles is that enactments or orders governing public rights and duties must be open and adequately published and that they should be relatively stable - Petition dismissed (Para 87)

( 1 ) TWO set of petitioners have approached this Court in these petitions raising several contentions, some of which overlap. The common challenge involved in all these petitions pertain to legality of the admission process undertaken by the State Government for various professional courses available in the State after passing Higher Secondary School Board Examinations in Science Stream. Essentially, the challenge is to the modalities adopted by the State Government in preparing merit lists for such professional courses.

( 2 ) THE petitioners in Special Civil Application No. 10720 of 2006 and connected matters are students who are pursuing studies in Gujarat in the schools affiliated to Central Board and have either appeared this year or will appear in the next couple of years in standard 12 examination conducted by the Central Board called CBSE. These petitions had come up for admission hearing on 12th May 2006 during summer vacation. After issuance of notice and filing of replies, they were ripe for hearing before this Court on 15th June 2006. Considering the importance and urgency of the issues involved in the matters, with the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the parties, these petitions were heard for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

( 3 ) SPECIAL Civil Application NO. 11346 of 2006 has been filed by the father of student who has appeared in standard 12 (HSC) science stream examination held by the Gujarat Board in March 2006. At the request of the Court, learned AGP Ms. Sangita Vishen had accepted an advance copy of the petition for the State Government and also within a short time available filed affidavit to which the petitioner has also filed rejoinder. Considering the importance of the issues and the commonality of some of the aspects of the matter with the group petitions filed by the students from Central Board schools, this petition was also simultaneously heard for final disposal. All appearing parties have advanced detailed arguments before this Court and raised several contentions.

( 4 ) IN order to appreciate the controversy arising, necessary facts need to be noted at this stage. Special Civil Application No. 10720 of 2006 and connected matters have been filed, as noted above, by the students pursuing their studies in schools affiliated with the Central Board. These petitioners may be conveniently referred to as the Central Board students. Petitioners Nos. 1 to 7 of Special Civil Application No. 10720 of 2006 are students who have appeared in their class 12 examination conducted by the Board called CBSE. They are eligible to apply for medical or para-medical courses or engineering or related subjects - as per the choice of their subjects - in various professional courses run by several institutes in the State. Petitioners Nos. 8 to 10 are students who have appeared in standard XI in their respective schools which are affiliated to Central Board. They are though not directly concerned with the exercise undertaken by the State Government for granting admissions to various professional courses in the current year, they have however, joined themselves in these petitions to safeguard their future interest.

( 5 ) BROADLY stated, the case of these petitioners is that in the State of Gujarat, there are different sources through which the students who pass their qualifying examination seek admission in various professional courses. It is, therefore, the case of these petitioners that the State Government must compulsorily conduct a common entrance test to prepare a common merit list from amongst all the students seeking such admissions. It is their case that they should be allowed to compete for all available seats in various medical, para-medical, engineering and other professional courses available after passing class 12 Science examinations. They also contend that the State Government should follow the regulations framed by the governing bodies such as Medical Council of India (MCI for sh





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top