( 1 ) RULE. The learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective respondents waive service.

( 2 ) CONSIDERING the controversy between the parties, the matter has been taken up for final hearing and disposal.

( 3 ) ON 13th May 2005, the Apex Court expressed its concern in the following terms:"when litigants come before courts raising disputes as to who shall function as Head of a religious or financial institutions, and they travel through the corridors of various courts and come before this court, one wonders when do these persons get time to think of purity sublime essences of religion and their duties as religious leaders. It has a sad reflection on the credibility of the religious institutions. Materialistic pursuits increasingly replace divine pursuits. The Present case at hand is no exception. "

( 4 ) NEARLY a year thereafter, unfortunately, the same position obtains and the direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the matter expeditiously preferably by the end of november, 2005 made by the Apex Court remains as a direction without there being effective compliance despite the assurance of the learned Counsel to the Supreme Court that the parties shall cooperate for ea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document