SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 399

M.R.SHAH
AMIT VISHNUPRASAD GAJJAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: Amee Yajnik, Bhunesh C.Rupera, MANISH J.PATEL, MANOJ N.POPAT, R.C.KODEKAR

M. R. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) AS common question of law and facts arise in this group of petitions / applications and they are arising out of the common judgment and order passed by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court no. 10, Ahmedabad passed in Criminal revision Application No. 176 of 2007, this group of petitions / applications are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

( 2 ) SPECIAL Criminal Application no. 982 of 2007 is filed by the applicant -original accused No. 3 challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 10, ahmedabad dated 30th April, 2007 passed in criminal Revision Application No. 176 of 2007 in allowing the said Criminal Revision application partly by which the learned additional City Sessions Judge has remanded the applicant - original accused No. 3 for 3 days police custody. Special Criminal Application No. 983 of 2007 is filed by the applicant - original accused No. 1 challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional City sessions Judge, Court No. 10, Ahmedabad dated 30th April, 2007 passed in Criminal revision Application No. 176 of 2007 by which the learned Judge has direc























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top