M.R.CALLA, R.M.DOSHIT
HER HIGHNESS SHANTADEVI PRATAPSINH RAO GAEKWAD – Appellant
Versus
SAVJIBHAI H. PATEL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE facts of this case depict a lis between an Ex-Ruler turned politician on one side and a builder developer - organizer on the other side who joined hands at the beginning apparently showing concern for the members of the weaker sections of the society through a highly ambitious project of raising 64,306 dwelling units in the city of Baroda as a joint venture to implement and further the 20-point programme of the then Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi. One was prepared to give the land which he was even otherwise likely to part with as an excess land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and the other offered his efforts, resources and initial expenditure for getting the scheme approved under S. 21 of the above referred Ceiling Act, of course not without any profit motive.
( 2 ) THIS is the defendants First Appeal under S. 96 of the C. P. C. against the judgment and decree dated 12-3-1992 passed by the learned Second Joint Civil Judge (S. D.), Baroda decreeing the Special Civil Suit No. 70 of 1980 with costs. The questions involved in this appeal mainly hinge around the provisions of the Specific relief Act, 1963, Urban Land (Ceiling and Reg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.