SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Guj) 15

D.N.PATEL, C.K.BUCH
Vijay Ranglal Chorasiya – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Appearance :
Appearance in Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 2000 :
Mr. K.J. Shethna, for the Appellant.
Mr. H.L. Jani, APP for the Opponents.
Appearance in Criminal Appeal No. 227 of 2000 :
Mr. H.L. Jani, APP for the Appellant.
Served, for the Opponents.
Appearance in Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 2000 :
Mr. N.C. Thakkar for the Appellant.
Mr. H.L.Jani, APP for the Opponents.
Appearance in Criminal Appeal No. 313 of 2000 :
Mr. M.M. Tirmizi for the Appellant.
Mr H.L. Jani, APP for the Opponents.
Appearance in Criminal Appeal No. 610 of 2000 :
Mr. J.M. Buddhabhatti, for the Appellant.
Mr. H.L. Jani, APP for the Opponents.
Appearance in Criminal Appeal No. 762 of 2000 :
Mr. J.A. Dave, for the Appellant.
Mr. H.L. Jani, APP for the Opponents.
Appearance in Criminal Appeal No. 1326 of 2006 :
Mr. H.L. Jani, APP for the Appellant.
Mr. J.A. Dave, for the Opponent.

Judgment

D.N. Patel, J.—Criminal Appeal Nos. 99, 227, 244, 313, 610 and 762 of the year 2000 arise out of judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 11.01.2000 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Sessions Case No. 99 of 1998 and Criminal Appeal No. 1326 of 2006 arises out of judgment and order of acquittal and sentence dated 31.01.2006 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 5, Bharuch in Sessions Case No. 99 of 2002. Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 2000 is preferred by the original accused No. 5; Criminal Appeal No. 244 of 2000 is preferred by original accused No. 2; Criminal Appeal No. 313 of 2000 is preferred by original accused No. 3; Criminal Appeal No. 610 of 2000 is preferred by original accused No. 11 and Criminal Appeal No. 762 of 2000 is preferred by original accused No. 4, who have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 364-A read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and are ordered to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default, simple imprisonment of two months has been awarded. They are also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 364 read with 120-B of the In




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top