J.B.PARDIWALA, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Kartik Mohanbhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat Through Secretary – Respondent
J.B. Pardiwala J.—By way of the present appeal, the appellant-original petitioner seeks to challenge judgment and order dated 15th September 2010 passed by the learned Single Judge wherein the petition of the appellant-writ petitioner came to be dismissed.
2. The brief facts relevant for the purpose of deciding the present appeal can be summarised as under:-
3. The appellant is the owner of land bearing Plot No. 476 part admeasuring 26,669 square meters (Original Plot No. 98/2-3). The appellant received a communication from the Chief Executive Officer, Vadodara Urban Development Authority (VUDA) intimating that Town Planning Scheme No. 1 (Bil) has been finally sanctioned and for the implementation of the said scheme with respect to the said area, a meeting has been convened on 19th June 2008. The appellant informed the authority that he may be provided with all the details and only thereafter a meeting may be convened. The appellant was not provided with the requisite information and even the map which was shown to the appellant was incomplete. The appellant sought certain information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Even under the Right to Information Act,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.